Thursday, November 17, 2005

Meanwhile, Republican Defections Grow

Well, if it were true, the title would be more powerful, but goodness me, it must be very challenging to hang on to the repuplican party under this leadership - particularly with those longstanding GOP members who maintain an independent moral/ethical foundation not tained by the lies of the W, Rove and Co. Sure, Murtha's a democrat, but he was/is respected on both sides of the congress. Read on...

I found the following post by the "Whitehouse Press Secretary" and imediately became curios what led to the W, Rove and Co's feeling they needed to headline it a day early (or tomorrow as it already is in Asia). It was the first - large and bolded - of three posts when I clicked on the whitehouse dot gov location under current news:
Congressman Murtha is a respected veteran and politician who has a record of supporting a strong America. So it is baffling that he is endorsing the policy positions of Michael Moore and the extreme liberal wing of the Democratic party. The eve of an historic democratic election in Iraq is not the time to surrender to the terrorists. After seeing his statement, we remain baffled -- nowhere does he explain how retreating from Iraq makes America safer.
The W, Rove and Co indeed must be simultaneously shaking in and defecating on their own shoes.

Here's what Congressman Murtha said/says:
Washington D.C.)- The war in Iraq is not going as advertised. It is a flawed policy wrapped in illusion. The American public is way ahead of us. The United States and coalition troops have done all they can in Iraq, but it is time for a change in direction. Our military is suffering. The future of our country is at risk. We can not continue on the present course. It is evident that continued military action in Iraq is not in the best interest of the United States of America, the Iraqi people or the Persian Gulf Region.

General Casey said in a September 2005 Hearing, “the perception of occupation in Iraq is a major driving force behind the insurgency.” General Abizaid said on the same date, “Reducing the size and visibility of the coalition forces in Iraq is a part of our counterinsurgency strategy.”

For 2 ½ years I have been concerned about the U.S. policy and the plan in Iraq. I have addressed my concerns with the Administration and the Pentagon and have spoken out in public about my concerns. The main reason for going to war has been discredited. A few days before the start of the war I was in Kuwait – the military drew a red line around Baghdad and said when U.S. forces cross that line they will be attacked by the Iraqis with Weapons of Mass Destruction – but the US forces said they were prepared. They had well trained forces with the appropriate protective gear.

We spend more money on Intelligence than all the countries in the world together, and more on Intelligence than most countries GDP. But the intelligence concerning Iraq was wrong. It is not a world intelligence failure. It is a U.S. intelligence failure and the way that intelligence was misused...

...Our troops have become the primary target of the insurgency. They are united against U.S. forces and we have become a catalyst for violence. [emphasis added] U.S. troops are the common enemy of the Sunnis, Saddamists and foreign jihadists. I believe with a U.S. troop redeployment, the Iraqi security forces will be incentivized to take control. A poll recently conducted shows that over 80% of Iraqis are strongly opposed to the presence of coalition troops, and about 45% of the Iraqi population believe attacks against American troops are justified. I believe we need to turn Iraq over to the Iraqis.
I believe before the Iraqi elections, scheduled for mid December, the Iraqi people and the emerging government must be put on notice that the United States will immediately redeploy. All of Iraq must know that Iraq is free. Free from United States occupation. I believe this will send a signal to the Sunnis to join the political process for the good of a “free” Iraq.

My plan calls:

To immediately redeploy U.S. troops consistent with the safety of U.S. forces.
To create a quick reaction force in the region.
To create an over- the- horizon presence of Marines.
To diplomatically pursue security and stability in Iraq

This war needs to be personalized. As I said before I have visited with the severely wounded of this war. They are suffering.

Because we in Congress are charged with sending our sons and daughters into battle, it is our responsibility, our OBLIGATION to speak out for them. That’s why I am speaking out.

Our military has done everything that has been asked of them, the U.S. can not accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. IT IS TIME TO BRING THEM HOME.

You get the idea, but should read more on his location.

If you think the W, Rove and Co. are going to be able to smear this guy, have a look at his background:

U.S. Rep. John P. Murtha has dedicated his life to serving his country both in the military and in the halls of Congress. He had a long and distinguished 37-year career in the U.S. Marine Corps, retiring from the Marine Corps Reserve as a colonel in 1990; and he has been serving the people of the 12th Congressional District since 1974, one of only 131 people in the nation's history to have served more than 30 years in the U.S. House of Representatives and one of only 224 Members of Congress who have served 30 or more years.

...He was awarded the Navy Distinguished Service Medal by the Marine Corps Commandant when he retired from the Marines.
Correct me if I am wrong, but no where in his speech did Murtha suggest we "surrender to the terrorists" as Scotty did in the opening salvo. Well, he may be setting himself up for a run for the whitehouse, but hey, I could give him a big kiss right about now. The W, Rove and Co. have got to have shit stains in their shorts over this one.

1 comment:

SheaNC said...

It's amazing who they will villify. I'd like to know what Murtha and Oliver North think of each other, and I'd like to see a debate between those two.