Thursday, October 13, 2005

Pulling the Wool Over Your Own Eyes

I love Helen Thomas. As a person who has been a part of the whitehouse press corps for a very long time, she knows how to squeeze the current administration's spokesmodel. Looks as though, not only is the W, Rove and Co. trying to pull the wool over our eyes, they are seriously engaged in pulling the wool over their own eyes. Troubling as it is, they really believe that they are right to be in Iraq based on the false connection between Iraq and the September 11, 2001 terrorist bombings. Have a look:
Q What does the President mean by "total victory" -- that we will never leave Iraq until we have "total victory"? What does that mean?

MR. McCLELLAN: Free and democratic Iraq in the heart of the Middle East, because a free and democratic Iraq in the heart of the Middle East will be a major blow to the ambitions --

Q If they ask us to leave, then we'll leave?

MR. McCLELLAN: I'm trying to respond. A free and democratic Iraq in the heart of the broader Middle East will be a major blow to the ambitions of al Qaeda and their terrorist associates. They want to establish or impose their rule over the broader Middle East -- we saw that in the Zawahiri letter that was released earlier this week by the intelligence community.

Q They also know we invaded Iraq.

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, Helen, the President recognizes that we are engaged in a global war on terrorism. And when you're engaged in a war, it's not always pleasant, and it's certainly a last resort. But when you engage in a war, you take the fight to the enemy, you go on the offense. And that's exactly what we are doing. We are fighting them there so that we don't have to fight them here. September 11th taught us --

Q It has nothing to do with -- Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, you have a very different view of the war on terrorism, and I'm sure you're opposed to the broader war on terrorism. The President recognizes this requires a comprehensive strategy, and that this is a broad war, that it is not a law enforcement matter. Terry.

Q On what basis do you say Helen is opposed to the broader war on terrorism?

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, she certainly expressed her concerns about Afghanistan and Iraq and going into those two countries. I think I can go back and pull up her comments over the course of the past couple of years.

Q And speak for her, which is odd.

MR. McCLELLAN: No, I said she may be, because certainly if you look at her comments over the course of the past couple of years, she's expressed her concerns --

Q I'm opposed to preemptive war, unprovoked preemptive war.

MR. McCLELLAN: -- she's expressed her concerns.
I love the following two lines from Helen:

Q It has nothing to do with -- Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

Q I'm opposed to preemptive war, unprovoked preemptive war


Sounds like Helen's on solid ground. Still no real answers but obfuscation from the W, Rove and Co. Right now, instead of expecting more from the current administration, I'm expecting less.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...


You're fired! Press Secretaries Do Not Presume To Have Their Own Agenda

MR. McCLELLAN: We are fighting them there so that we don't have to fight them here. September 11th taught us --

Q It has nothing to do with -- Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, you have a very different view of the war on terrorism, ...


Bush said on TV that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. It may have been a passing moment of honesty on his part. But he did say it.

Agents are often more formidable than principals. McClellan proved that he can be a bigger liar than Bush. His days are numbered. He failed to accurately report what his President said.

You don't get to one-up the President, there's nothing in it for the President to be one-upped. Unlike in private industry where if your agents are better than you, your bonus is bigger. The President has to fire McClellan or reinforce the perception he's a wuss.

(Another problem rat aboard ship.)