Hummm, and we thought Saddam was dangerous. Take a look at this NYTimes article by their editorial staff:
Slice:
"President Bush's misbegotten invasion of Iraq appears to have achieved what Saddam Hussein did not: putting dangerous weapons in the hands of terrorists and creating an offshoot of Al Qaeda in Iraq.
The murder of dozens of Iraqi Army recruits over the weekend is being attributed to the forces of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who has been identified by the Bush administration as a leading terrorist and a supposed link between Iraq and Al Qaeda. That was not true before the war - as multiple investigations have shown. But the breakdown of order since the invasion has changed all that. This terrorist, who has claimed many attacks on occupation forces and the barbaric murder of hostages, recently swore allegiance to Osama bin Laden and renamed his group Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia..."
End Slice:
How nice! Bush is better at arming terrorist than Saddam...At least he is good at something - Ha! Perhaps we should invade Washington DC.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
If you havent seen it already check out the link to Baghdad Burning on my site. There is a letter from an Iraqi citizen about the elections and America.
Post a Comment